Any clause checked against your playbook in seconds, with wording
Paste a clause and the flow compares it with your contract playbook and standard terms, gives one of three verdicts and quotes the playbook position behind it. Where a change is needed, it proposes the exact replacement wording.
Legal · Someone asks · 4 steps · Reads your documents
QuestionQuestion
RetrieveRetrieve
AnswerAnswer
Answer shownAnswer shown
4 steps in the flowDrag the canvas, or any step, to move it around.
Why teams run it
Commercial teams wait on legal for clauses the playbook already decides, and legal spends its time restating positions it wrote down years ago. When the playbook is consulted inconsistently, the company signs different terms with different customers without meaning to.
How it is governed
- It is instructed never to advise beyond your written playbook.
- Every verdict quotes the playbook position it relies on.
- Retrieval respects each source’s own permissions for the person asking.
- Every clause checked and verdict given is kept in the run history.
- Who runs it
- In-house counsel; Contract managers; Commercial and deal desk teams.
- What you supply
- Your contract playbook and standard terms as knowledge sources.
It ships with test questions
- Unlimited liability clause
- Governing law is the supplier state
From template to a live agent
The same builder, tests and release review apply to a template as to anything built from scratch.
- Open it as a working flow
- Every step, source, branch and approval is already in place, and every one of them can be changed before it runs on your data.
- Prove it before it ships
- An evaluation set can gate the release, so a change that breaks an answer never reaches anyone. A question it cannot answer from the sources leaves the gate unproven, not passed.
- Keep a person on the decisions
- A run that needs a decision stops and says exactly what approving will do, and who it is waiting for.
- Publish where people work
- A form, an embedded widget, Microsoft Teams or a scheduled batch — with its own access and limits per deployment.
- What teams usually change
- Load your playbook, fallback positions and standard terms as knowledge sources; Change the verdict scale to match your escalation levels; Accept a whole contract as a file instead of one clause.
Questions buyers ask
- Is this legal advice?
- No. It applies your own playbook and standard terms and is instructed never to give advice beyond them. Anything the playbook doesn’t cover should go to counsel.
- Can it review a whole contract?
- As shipped it checks one pasted clause at a time, which keeps each verdict tied to one playbook position. The start step can be changed in the builder to take an attached document.
- How consistent are its verdicts?
- It runs at the lowest temperature setting and answers only from retrieved playbook passages, so the same clause against the same playbook tends to get the same verdict. Test clauses ship with the template to check it before anyone relies on it.
Related templates
All 60 templates- Privacy questionnaireAnswers data-protection questions from your DPA and records of processing.LegalSomeone asks4 steps
- Lease abstractorPulls the terms out of a lease — dates, rent, break clauses — so a portfolio can be compared without reading every document.LegalA document or recording is attached5 stepsa person approves
- Contract version comparisonSays what changed between two drafts and what each change means, ignoring rewording that carries the same sense.LegalA document or recording is attached4 steps
See it run on your own data
We open it in the builder, point it at a sample of your documents and systems, and run it with you.