TemplatesGet a demo →Book a meeting

Security questionnaires answered from what you’ve already written

Attach a security or procurement questionnaire and the flow drafts answers from your past RFPs, policies and security documentation, citing the source for each claim. Where you cannot claim something, the draft says so rather than inventing a capability.

Sales · A document or recording is attached · 4 steps · Reads your documents

AI Factory · RFP answer drafterthe flow as it opens in the builder
A fileThe document
RetrieveRetrieve
AnswerAnswer
Answer shownAnswer shown
4 steps in the flowDrag the canvas, or any step, to move it around.

Why teams run it

Every questionnaire asks the same things in different words, and the answers live in last year’s responses, the security policy and a solutions engineer’s memory. Teams lose days to copy-and-paste, and a confident answer that overstates a control is a contractual risk.

How it is governed

  • Every claim must cite the source document it came from.
  • It is instructed to state plainly what you cannot claim, not stretch it.
  • Retrieval respects each source’s own permissions for the person running it.
  • Every run is kept in the run history.
Who runs it
Solutions engineers; Proposal and bid managers; Security and compliance leads.
What you supply
Past RFPs, policies and security docs as knowledge sources.

It ships with test questions

  • Do you encrypt data at rest?
  • What is your RPO and RTO?
What “a person approves” looks like in the product: the run stops, the banner says what approving will do, and until someone decides, nothing leaves the system. A demo workspace on synthetic data.

From template to a live agent

The same builder, tests and release review apply to a template as to anything built from scratch.

Open it as a working flow
Every step, source, branch and approval is already in place, and every one of them can be changed before it runs on your data.
Prove it before it ships
An evaluation set can gate the release, so a change that breaks an answer never reaches anyone. A question it cannot answer from the sources leaves the gate unproven, not passed.
Keep a person on the decisions
A run that needs a decision stops and says exactly what approving will do, and who it is waiting for.
Publish where people work
A form, an embedded widget, Microsoft Teams or a scheduled batch — with its own access and limits per deployment.
What teams usually change
Add your latest policies and approved answer library as knowledge sources; Loop over each question so every answer gets its own search; Add an approval step before answers leave the team.
Step 02, in the product: an evaluation set that gates the release. A question it cannot answer from the sources leaves the gate unproven, not passed. A demo workspace on synthetic data.

Questions buyers ask

How does it handle a long questionnaire?
As shipped, it searches your library once for the whole document and drafts from what it finds, which suits a section or a short questionnaire. For long ones, teams add a For each step in the builder so every question gets its own search and answer.
Will it overstate what we do?
It is instructed to answer only from your documents, in the questionnaire’s own register with no marketing language, and to say you do not claim something when your sources don’t support it. Every claim carries a citation so a reviewer can check it.
What file types can it read?
The questionnaire can be attached as a PDF, Word, text or Markdown file, and its text is read before anything else runs. A file of a type the step does not accept is refused up front with the reason.

See it run on your own data

We open it in the builder, point it at a sample of your documents and systems, and run it with you.