TemplatesGet a demo →Book a meeting

Are we allowed to? Answered from your policies, clause quoted

Staff describe what they are trying to do and get the policy position with the clause it comes from. Where your policies are silent, the answer says so instead of reasoning its way to a permission.

Compliance · Someone asks · 7 steps · Reads your documentsA person is asked at “Ask a person”

AI Factory · Policy answer deskthe flow as it opens in the builder
QuestionQuestion
RetrieveRetrieve
AnswerAnswer
If / elseGrounded in the sources?
Answer shownAnswer shown
Ask a personAsk a person
Answer shownAnswer shown
7 steps in the flowDrag the canvas, or any step, to move it around.

Why teams run it

Compliance teams field the same permission questions by email every week, and the answer depends on who picks it up. Staff who can’t get a quick answer either wait or guess, and a guess that turns out wrong becomes a finding.

How it is governed

  • It is instructed never to infer a permission the policies do not grant.
  • Every answer cites the policy clause it relies on.
  • Escalated questions wait for compliance approval before anything is shown.
  • Every question and answer is kept in the run history.
Who runs it
Compliance officers; Risk and policy managers; Employees across the business.
What you supply
Your policies as knowledge sources.
What “a person approves” looks like in the product: the run stops, the banner says what approving will do, and until someone decides, nothing leaves the system. A demo workspace on synthetic data.

From template to a live agent

The same builder, tests and release review apply to a template as to anything built from scratch.

Open it as a working flow
Every step, source, branch and approval is already in place, and every one of them can be changed before it runs on your data.
Prove it before it ships
An evaluation set can gate the release, so a change that breaks an answer never reaches anyone. A question it cannot answer from the sources leaves the gate unproven, not passed.
Keep a person on the decisions
A run that needs a decision stops and says exactly what approving will do, and who it is waiting for.
Publish where people work
A form, an embedded widget, Microsoft Teams or a scheduled batch — with its own access and limits per deployment.
What teams usually change
Make the check stricter, so 'policy is silent' answers reach compliance; Name the compliance officer or queue who rules on escalations; Load regional policy variants as separate knowledge sources.
Step 02, in the product: an evaluation set that gates the release. A question it cannot answer from the sources leaves the gate unproven, not passed. A demo workspace on synthetic data.

Questions buyers ask

What happens when our policies don’t cover the question?
The answer says policy is silent rather than reasoning its way to a yes. If the answer step returns nothing at all, the question goes to the compliance team; many teams also route 'silent' answers there.
Can staff rely on it as a ruling?
It reports what your written policies say, with the clause quoted, and is instructed not to go further. A ruling on anything the policies don’t settle stays with your compliance team.
Is there a record of what people asked?
Yes. Every question, the answer given and any escalation decision are kept in the run history, which supports review of how policy questions are being handled.

See it run on your own data

We open it in the builder, point it at a sample of your documents and systems, and run it with you.