TemplatesGet a demo →Book a meeting

Retirement applications checked against plan rules before anyone replies

Attach an application and the flow checks eligibility, the benefit option, spousal consent and payment details against your plan rules, marking each met, missing or inconsistent. The draft reply to the member waits for the retirement team’s approval.

Operations · Pensions & retirement · A document or recording is attached · 6 steps · Reads your documentsA person is asked at “Ask a person”

AI Factory · Retirement application review · run 1225a real run on synthetic data · recorded Sep 11, 2026
A fileThe document
RetrieveRetrieve274 ms3 passages
AnswerAnswer3.8 s
Ask a personAsk a person
Answer shownAnswer shown1 ms
Answer shownHeld back
5 of 6 steps ran4.1 s end to end$0.009 model costDrag the canvas, or any step, to move it around.
Asked: “A retirement application is attached: a synthetic one, missing the spouse's consent and the employer's final confirmation.”

To process Jordan A. Sample's retirement application, we need to verify the following requirements based on the plan's rules:

  1. Eligibility by Age and Service:
  2. Age: Jordan is 65, which meets the normal retirement age requirement [7, 8].
  3. Service: 31 years with participating employers, which is consistent with the requirement for eligibility [8].
  1. Benefit Option Chosen:
  2. Joint and Survivor Annuity, 50%: This option requires spousal consent if the member is married [2, 5]. Jordan is married, but the spouse's consent is not enclosed, making the application incomplete in this regard.
  1. Required Documents:
  2. Retirement Application: Received and signed by the member [1].
  3. Identification: Proof of age provided (birth certificate) [1].
  4. Employment History: Not explicitly mentioned, but assumed complete based on service record [1].
  5. Beneficiary Designation: Not mentioned, needs to be provided [1].
  6. Bank Information: Direct deposit form enclosed [1].
  7. Final Employer Confirmation: Not enclosed, needs to be requested from the employer [3].
  1. Spouse's Consent:
  2. Required for the chosen benefit option but not provided [2].

Next Steps:
- Request the spouse's notarized written consent for the joint and survivor annuity option.

- Obtain the final confirmation of employment from Example Community Services.

Draft Reply to Member:

Dear Jordan A. Sample,

Thank you for submitting your retirement application. To proceed, we need the following:

  1. Your spouse's notarized written consent for the joint and survivor annuity option you have chosen.
  2. Final confirmation of your employment from Example Community Services. We will request this directly from your employer.

Once these…

Why teams run it

A retirement application is where errors cost the most: a missing spousal consent or a wrong service date can delay a first payment or set it at the wrong amount. Case workers check each file against the rules by hand, and a second reader is often the only safeguard.

How it is governed

  • No reply leaves the flow until the retirement team approves it.
  • A rejected draft ends the run and is recorded as not sent.
  • The approver’s decision is kept in the run history.
  • It is instructed never to state a benefit amount the rules do not give.
Who runs it
Retirement case workers; Benefits operations managers; Pension administrators.
What you supply
Your plan rules and benefit guides as knowledge sources.
What “a person approves” looks like in the product: the run stops, the banner says what approving will do, and until someone decides, nothing leaves the system. A demo workspace on synthetic data.

From template to a live agent

The same builder, tests and release review apply to a template as to anything built from scratch.

Open it as a working flow
Every step, source, branch and approval is already in place, and every one of them can be changed before it runs on your data.
Prove it before it ships
An evaluation set can gate the release, so a change that breaks an answer never reaches anyone. A question it cannot answer from the sources leaves the gate unproven, not passed.
Keep a person on the decisions
A run that needs a decision stops and says exactly what approving will do, and who it is waiting for.
Publish where people work
A form, an embedded widget, Microsoft Teams or a scheduled batch — with its own access and limits per deployment.
What teams usually change
Add the checks your plan requires, such as proof of age or marital status; Name who approves: the retirement team, a supervisor, or a named person; Load your benefit election forms and guides as knowledge sources.
Step 02, in the product: an evaluation set that gates the release. A question it cannot answer from the sources leaves the gate unproven, not passed. A demo workspace on synthetic data.

Questions buyers ask

Does it calculate the member’s benefit?
No. It checks the application against the rules and is instructed never to state a benefit amount, payment date or entitlement the sources do not give. Calculation stays in your administration system.
Does approving send the reply to the member?
Approving releases the review and the draft reply to your team; the template has no step that emails or posts anything to the member. Your team sends the reply through its usual channel.
What formats can applications arrive in?
The file step accepts PDF, Word and plain-text files and reads their text before anything else runs. A file of any other type is refused up front with the reason, rather than failing partway through the review.

See it run on your own data

We open it in the builder, point it at a sample of your documents and systems, and run it with you.